Neuroscience • Cognitive Research
The parietal lobe sits between the visual cortex at the back of the brain and the somatosensory cortex just behind the central sulcus. Textbooks have described it this way for decades. Most neurology students learn the basics in their second year and move on.
Edoardo Bisiach and Claudio Luzzatti did not move on.
The intricate neural architecture of the human brain
In 1978, these two researchers at the Centro di Neuropsicologia dell'Università di Milano published a short paper in Cortex. The paper described two patients. One was an 86-year-old woman, a retired manager. The other was a 72-year-old male lawyer. Both had suffered strokes affecting the right temporoparietal region. Both had a condition called hemispatial neglect.
Patients with hemispatial neglect behave as if one side of the world does not exist. They eat food from only one side of their plate. They shave only one side of their face. They draw clocks with all the numbers crowded onto the right half. The left side of space simply disappears from their awareness.
Bisiach and Luzzatti wanted to know something specific. When these patients closed their eyes and imagined a familiar place, would the left side of that imagined place also disappear?
Both patients knew the Piazza del Duomo in Milan. The researchers asked them to imagine standing on the steps of the cathedral and describe what they saw. Nearly all the features mentioned were ones that would have been on their right from that viewpoint. Shops on the left side of the square went unmentioned.
Then the researchers asked the patients to imagine standing at the opposite end of the square, facing the cathedral. The patients now described the previously neglected buildings. Those buildings were now on their right.
The patients knew the entire square. The information was in their memory. They just could not access all of it at once. Whatever side would have been on their left from their imagined viewpoint was simply gone.
This finding changed how researchers thought about the posterior parietal cortex. The region was not just processing incoming sensory information. It was involved in constructing internal representations of space. Damage to the right posterior parietal cortex disrupted something fundamental about how the brain organizes spatial awareness.
The parietal cortex constructs our sense of space
Decades of study have revealed the cortex's secrets
The posterior parietal cortex consists of Brodmann areas 5, 7, 39, and 40 in humans. In macaque monkeys, it consists of areas 5 and 7. In rodents, just area 7. The intraparietal sulcus divides it into a superior parietal lobule and an inferior parietal lobule. The inferior parietal lobule contains the supramarginal gyrus, the temporoparietal junction, and the angular gyrus.
These anatomical divisions matter because different parts do different things.
Handles visuomotor control. Reaching for a coffee cup. Tracking a moving object with your eyes. Coordinating hand movements in space. Damage here produces optic ataxia. Patients can see an object but cannot reach for it accurately.
Damage to this region on the right side produces hemispatial neglect. The left side of space simply ceases to exist for the patient's attention and awareness.
On the left side, damage affects mathematical ability, reading, and understanding symbols. Different functions emerge from the same structure on opposite hemispheres.
Giacomo Rizzolatti's team at the University of Parma discovered something unexpected about the parietal cortex in the 1990s. They were recording from neurons in the ventral premotor cortex of macaque monkeys, studying neurons that fired when the monkey grasped objects. A graduate student reached for a peanut. A neuron fired. The monkey had not moved.
The same neurons that fired when the monkey performed an action also fired when the monkey watched someone else perform that action. Rizzolatti's team found these mirror neurons in the inferior frontal gyrus and in the inferior parietal lobule. About 10% of neurons in these regions have mirror properties.
The parietal mirror neurons were not doing the same thing as the frontal ones. Leonardo Fogassi, working with Rizzolatti, published a paper in Science in 2005 showing that parietal mirror neurons encoded the intention behind an action.
A neuron would fire differently when a monkey watched someone grasp food to eat it versus grasping food to place it in a container. The motor act was identical. The goal was different. The parietal cortex was reading intentions.
The posterior parietal cortex sits at a crossroads. It receives input from visual cortex, auditory cortex, somatosensory cortex, motor cortex, cingulate cortex, and prefrontal cortex. It integrates proprioceptive signals telling the brain where the body is in space. It processes vestibular information about balance and head position.
This convergence of inputs creates something the brain needs constantly. A unified sense of where the body is, where objects are, and how to act on them.
Stroke patients with right parietal damage lose this integration. The deficit shows up in ways that seem bizarre until you understand what the parietal cortex actually does.
A patient might deny that their left arm belongs to them. Somatoparaphrenia, this is called. The arm is there. They can see it. But the sense that it is their arm has been disrupted.
A patient might be unable to disengage attention from the right side of space. Michael Posner and colleagues showed this in 1984 using a simple cueing task. A cue appears on one side. A target appears on the other side. Parietal patients cannot shift attention away from the cued location to detect the target on the opposite side.
The right hemisphere appears dominant for spatial attention. The right parietal lobe attends to space on both sides of the body. The left parietal lobe attends mainly to the right side. When the right hemisphere is damaged, the left cannot compensate. Left-sided neglect results.
Recovery from hemispatial neglect varies. Most patients in the acute phase after stroke show some improvement as swelling decreases and reperfusion occurs. At twelve weeks, neglect persists in about 17% of patients with right hemisphere lesions. These patients have longer hospital stays and higher rates of falls. Many cannot return to work.
Jacinta O'Shea at Oxford has been testing brain stimulation approaches. The undamaged left hemisphere becomes hyperactive after right hemisphere stroke. Suppressing this hyperactivity with transcranial magnetic stimulation can temporarily reduce neglect. The effect lasts only minutes.
A behavioral therapy called prism adaptation produces longer-lasting effects. Patients wear glasses containing prisms that shift the visual field to the right. They learn to adapt by shifting their hand-eye coordination leftward. This training improves many symptoms, but the benefit typically fades within 24 hours.
O'Shea's group tried something different. Instead of suppressing the left parietal cortex, they stimulated the left sensorimotor cortex while patients underwent prism adaptation. The idea was to strengthen memory for the adaptation.
The results exceeded expectations. Patients with chronic neglect, more than a year after stroke, showed improvements that lasted far longer than expected. Plasticity that had seemed dormant could be reawakened.
Modern imaging reveals unprecedented detail in cortical mapping
Modern imaging has revealed more subdivisions within the posterior parietal cortex than Brodmann's original maps suggested. The Human Connectome Project atlas identifies over twenty distinct regions. Area 7 alone contains multiple subdivisions: 7AL, 7Am, 7PC, 7PL, 7Pm. The intraparietal sulcus contains AIP, LIPd, LIPv, MIP, VIP, IP0, IP1, IP2.
Each region has distinct connectivity patterns. Each appears to serve somewhat different functions. The lateral intraparietal area in humans is implicated in the fine eye movement control required for reading. The ventral intraparietal area responds to stimuli approaching the face. The anterior intraparietal area is involved in grasping.
The complexity keeps increasing as techniques improve.
Single-cell recordings in monkeys show that parietal neurons encode reaches in a sequence of planned movements. Some neurons represent only the next movement. Others can represent multiple planned targets in parallel. The parietal cortex is not just reacting to the world. It is preparing for actions that have not yet occurred.
Learning a new motor skill activates the posterior parietal cortex. As proficiency increases, activation decreases. Novice artists show more right parietal activation than experts when performing art-related tasks. The region seems especially engaged when skills are still being acquired.
A 2016 paper in PNAS from researchers in the Netherlands showed that the posterior parietal cortex encodes memories for spatial locations rapidly. Activity begins with the first visit to a location and increases with each additional encounter. The hippocampus shows the opposite pattern. Its activity is strongest during initial encoding and declines with repetition.
The parietal cortex and hippocampus appear to form complementary memory systems. The hippocampus handles rapid initial encoding. The parietal cortex gradually builds stable representations through repetition.
This division of labor has implications for navigation. Taxi drivers learning a new city rely heavily on hippocampal processing. Once routes become familiar, parietal representations take over.
Hemispatial neglect affects about 80% of stroke patients with right hemisphere damage in the acute phase. Most recover. Some do not. For those with lasting neglect, daily life becomes difficult in ways that are hard to appreciate unless you see it.
A man walks down a hallway and bumps into the left wall repeatedly. He is not blind on that side. His eyes work fine. Something upstream from vision has broken. The left side of the world no longer registers as important.
A woman reads a newspaper and cannot find the beginning of each line. She starts reading in the middle. The left margin does not exist for her attention.
Bisiach and Luzzatti's patients could recall buildings on both sides of the Piazza del Duomo, just not at the same time. The memories were there. Access to them depended on an imagined viewpoint. Change the viewpoint and the previously invisible became visible.
The posterior parietal cortex spans approximately 150 square centimeters
Extensive growth after the emergence of primates
The posterior parietal cortex constructs the frame through which we experience space. Damage that frame and spatial experience itself becomes incomplete.
The region covers about 150 square centimeters in humans. It evolved extensively after the emergence of primates. No rodent model captures its full complexity. No current imaging technique resolves all its subdivisions.
What researchers know keeps changing as methods improve. Brodmann's maps from 1909 were a starting point. The Human Connectome Project atlas is more detailed. Future parcellations will be more detailed still.
Brodmann publishes his original cortical maps, providing a foundational framework for understanding brain regions.
Bisiach and Luzzatti publish their landmark study on hemispatial neglect and imagined space in Cortex.
Michael Posner and colleagues demonstrate attention disengagement deficits in parietal patients using cueing tasks.
Rizzolatti's team discovers mirror neurons in the inferior parietal lobule and inferior frontal gyrus.
Fogassi publishes evidence that parietal mirror neurons encode intention, not just action.
The posterior parietal cortex integrates sensation and action, perception and intention, memory and prediction. It constructs the spatial scaffolding on which experience depends. When it fails, the world loses a dimension. Not vision. Not sensation. Something harder to name. The coherent sense of being located somewhere, in a space that extends in all directions, with a body that can act on what surrounds it.
Bisiach and Luzzatti demonstrated in 1978 that this construction is just that. A construction. Not a passive reception of the world as it is. An active building of the world as the brain represents it.
The Piazza del Duomo exists. The patients knew it. But their brains could not build a complete representation of it. Half was always missing. Which half depended on where they imagined themselves standing.